vote niv!

1414-july22-2004

kcaz3481 (2:10:20 PM): vote niv....
kcaz3481 (2:10:22 PM): is
kcaz3481 (2:10:25 PM): amazing
kcaz3481 (2:10:33 PM): like ten times more amazing than i thought it would be
monsterniv (2:11:52 PM): really?
monsterniv (2:11:53 PM): wow
kcaz3481 (2:12:13 PM): wow
kcaz3481 (2:12:14 PM): this
kcaz3481 (2:12:18 PM): this is like christmas

i'm working on creating a best of elscorcho thing. the best cuts from the strip steak that is this site. they exist, they are excellent, but there are only a few of them.

comments

re: my suggestion

from: chad (2004-07-22 17:01:35)

you should change where it says Navigate in the upper lefthand corner to say "Niv-igate." Just cause you can.

re: another idea...

from: niv (2004-07-22 20:21:59)

i was considering making it say "niv-nav"

hehe

re: succulent & tender

from: ken (2004-07-23 09:08:04)

that is how my sneak preview of 'best of' tasted.

re: comment

from: niv (2004-07-26 10:27:35)

testing out the newish comment system

re: comment

from: anonymous (2004-07-26 11:33:21)

another test

re: comment

from: chad (2004-07-26 12:50:22)

it isnt that different

re: comment

from: niv (2004-07-26 13:06:04)

chaddles! no titles... time stamps... cmon man, there are differences here.

re: a title?

from: ken (2004-07-26 14:45:39)

i like the timestamps, but i also liked the titles

re: you are alone

from: niv (2004-07-26 14:48:32)

no one else liked the titles ken. geoff and birgit in particular complained a lot on the site, and other people complained to me. sooo yeah

sorry!

re: niv sucks

from: chad (2004-07-26 14:57:56)

i like the titles. they are very useful.

and time stamps are fun. but the "recent comments" thing on the side is far far far less useful when the comments are identified only by time and not by title. and, to be honest, geoff is just a complainer, so i don't think you should put too much weight into his opinion.

re: what i think is a good compromise

from: niv (2004-07-26 15:05:31)

ok, maybe i'll make the recent comments show the time and who posted it!

re: comment

from: chad (2004-07-26 15:52:38)

who posted it is fun and helpful. things are improving here by the minute!

by the way, when is geoff going to read my last comment and make a snide remark about me?

re: comment

from: niv (2004-07-27 10:35:36)

never, because geoff sucks

re: comment

from: geoff (2004-07-27 13:29:24)

you suck

re: comment

from: niv (2004-07-27 13:39:44)

god, i make changes for you and this is the thanks i get

re: to settle this debate in a fair manner

from: chad (2004-07-27 14:28:38)

niv says that geoff sucks
geoff responds to niv in kind
chad states: you both suck

re: speaking of sucking

from: chad (2004-07-27 14:29:45)

the "new" label is fannnnn-tastic. but it also appears too far to the right and therefore disappears under the side-bar menu that lists "news, archives, etc"

re: chad sucks

from: niv (2004-07-27 14:34:39)

yeah, i forgot to test it in IE. and then i did test it. and now it works.

 

name

email

website

save info?

comment title

comment

what is seven plus four? (in digits, please)
current time
October 12, 2008 16:00:39

please use html when creating links. click here if you do not know how to do this.